If not the single highest person in NOAA, who will stand for the Scientific Integrity of the agency and the trust our public needs to invest in our scientific process and products?”. BREAKING: House Oversight is investigating whether US military expenditures have been propping up Trump Turnberry. That in turn led to an unsigned statement released by NOAA leadership, intended to aid the White House in damage control. Scott K. Johnson - Jun 16, 2020 4:40 pm UTC

It read: From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama. Related Articles In it, he colorfully expresses some frustration that the report recommends no consequences for anyone involved, which caught the eye of The Washington Post’s Capital Weather Gang blog in its coverage. September 8, 2019 in alt-left, Berniebots, Democrats, , , =, elections, hurricane, Kamala, LEFTOVERS, lies, media, racism . Election 2020: Biden looks to expand map against Trump While warning of Hurricane Dorian, President Donald Trump today displayed a NOAA map that appeared to be doctored to line up with his proclamation that Hurricane Dorian could hit Alabama. "From Wednesday, August 28, through Monday, September 2, the information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama," NOAA wrote in a statement Friday, that also pointed to a number of its advisories during that period. President @r Sharpie; NOAA; Thornberry. More:Trump and Joe Walsh both fundraise off of #SharpieGate as NOAA issues statement, “The NWS Forecaster(s) corrected any public misunderstanding in an expert and timely way, as they should,” NOAA’s Craig McLean wrote in an email to his agency colleagues Sunday, according to the Washington Post.“There followed, last Friday, an unsigned news release from 'NOAA’ that inappropriately and incorrectly contradicted the NWS forecaster.

GET BREAKING NEWS IN YOUR BROWSER. As Hurricane Dorian devastated the Bahamas and threatened parts of the United States, Trump held firm on his Sept. 1 claim that the storm would threaten Alabama, despite being contradicted by the National Weather Service on Sunday soon after his original tweet. “They recommended, at two different points, that the reference to the Birmingham WFO be removed — an edit that, if accepted, may have avoided the policy violation. A Commerce Department spokesperson has denied the Times report in a statement provided to CNN. WIRED Media Group Join the Ars Orbital Transmission mailing list to get weekly updates delivered to your inbox. President returns to White House from Walter Reed However, when the edit was not incorporated, they chose to release the statement as a NOAA document,” the panel said. Specifically, the panel determined that acting Administrator of NOAA Neil Jacobs and NOAA Deputy Chief of Staff and Director of Communications Julie Roberts violated NOAA’s Code of Ethics for Science Supervision and Management and the agency’s Scientific Integrity Policy in writing and releasing the September 6 statement. President Donald Trump was the one who used a black Sharpie marker to alter an official National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration map to …

CNMN Collection The incident dragged the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration into the controversy. "The Birmingham National Weather Service’s Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time," NOAA also said in the statement. He says there was a small probability of some weather impacts in Alabama (rescuing an extremely charitable reading of the president’s tweet) but that the Birmingham office was also right to communicate that there was no risk of the dangerous weather conditions occurring closer to the hurricane.

All Access Digital offer for just 99 cents!

President’s doctor: Trump ‘may not entirely be out of the woods’ - Jun 16, 2020 4:40 pm UTC. By excluding the Birmingham office from the development of the statement, Jacobs and Roberts “engaged in the misconduct intentionally, knowingly, or in reckless disregard of the Code of Scientific Conduct or Code of Ethics for Science Supervision and Management in NOAA’s Scientific Integrity Policy,” the panel wrote.

Federal Weather Workers ‘Shocked’ and ‘Irate’ by NOAA Backing Trump, Union Head Says . The system will remain too far east.”, But on September 6, NOAA released a statement saying, “The information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to President Trump and the wider public demonstrated that tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.

Top officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association violated its ethical standards and scientific integrity policy when it issued a statement contradicting a local National Weather Service office during Hurricane Dorian in 2019, a scientific misconduct investigation determined. The Atlantic hurricane season, by the way, is once again underway. Trump used an altered NOAA map of Hurricane Dorian’s path as a visual aid while speaking reporters in the Oval Office last week. And Jacobs claims his goal with the statement was to reconcile President Trump’s tweet with Birmingham’s tweet. According to the Times, Ross confronted acting NOAA Administrator Neil Jacobs by phone, demanding the agency fix the contradiction of Trump. During Dorian’s approach to the United States last year, President Donald Trump showed members of the media an image of the storm’s potential path, which included a marker drawing in an area of Alabama. … The Birmingham National Weather Service’s Sunday morning tweet spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time.”. With Commerce leadership insisting on a statement fully vindicating and placating President Trump, it was difficult to thread that needle. has denied the Times report in a statement provided to CNN. Both Neil Jacobs and Julie Roberts submitted letters defending themselves, which are included with the report. a statement that sought to bolster President Donald Trump's erroneous claim, contradicted by the National Weather Service, Then, an unsigned statement released by NOAA, Trump and Joe Walsh both fundraise off of #SharpieGate as NOAA issues statement. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. McLean writes, “While there may be found causes of sympathy for the oppressed and meek subordinates of domineering autocratic ogres, I hardly can find sympathy in this scintilla of an argument for clemency. Ad Choices, Email release reveals chaos sowed by President Trump’s hurricane tweets, In speech to forecasters, NOAA chief tries to tamp down Sharpie controversy. “I will.”. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement (updated 1/1/20) and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement (updated 1/1/20) and Ars Technica Addendum (effective 8/21/2018).

Culture NOAA Just Sided With Trump Over ‘Sharpie Gate,” Leaves Media Looking Like Buffoons Yet Again The Friday NOAA statement included a link to a series of advisory graphics that clearly showed a progression of projected possible hurricane and tropical storm …

WASHINGTON -- The acting chief scientist at NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, is conducting an investigation after a week that ended with the scientific agency issuing a statement that sought to bolster President Donald Trump's erroneous claim that a recent hurricane posed a threat to the state of Alabama. Sign up or login to join the discussions! It found that the statement “did not constitute scientific misconduct” or prevent scientists from communicating their work to the public. Report faults NOAA leaders’ response to president’s Sharpie moment Report finds problems but can’t talk to the people who ordered a key statement.

The New York Times also reported Monday that Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross threatened to fire top employees at NOAA after the NWS’s Birmingham station contradicted President Trump's claim about Hurricane Dorian's path and Alabama. The development was reported Monday by both the Washington Post and the New York Times. However, the report also includes a letter from NOAA Acting Chief Scientist Craig McLean, who submitted one of the initial complaints. Now, a new memo laying out the final decision on three allegations of misconduct says that an independent panel investigating NOAA leadership’s actions during the storm’s approach violated the agency’s ethical and scientific standards. This is clearly demonstrated in Hurricane Advisories #15 through #41, which can be viewed at the following link.

© 2020 Condé Nast. We repeat, no impacts from Hurricane #Dorian will be felt across Alabama. In addition, the panel addresses the allegation that “the drafting of the September 6 Statement was driven by external political pressure from Department of Commerce … senior leaders and inappropriately criticized the September 1 Birmingham Tweet and underlying scientific activity.”, The panel found that Jacobs and Roberts “did not believe it was a good idea to release a statement, but felt significant external pressure to do so.”. Although he came from the private sector, he is a meteorologist and has received support from some scientists in NOAA or associated with the organization. The Birmingham office of the National Weather Service had quickly responded to questions by tweeting that Alabama was not forecast to be impacted. All rights reserved. Jacobs is still the acting administrator of NOAA, as he hasn’t yet been confirmed by the Senate.

President says he will leave hospital tonight Then, an unsigned statement released by NOAA late Friday disavowed the Sept. 1 tweet by the Birmingham station of the National Weather Service that had sought to correct Trump's claim. Your California Privacy Rights | Do Not Sell My Personal Information

In his four-page response, Jacobs argued that the National Academy of Public Administration, the panel presiding over the investigation, never questioned or refuted “the scientific veracity of the actual statement” from September 6. Read our affiliate link policy. It finds violations of NOAA’s scientific integrity policy, but it recommends policy clarifications and better training rather than direct consequences for those involved in releasing the statement. John McAfee arrested in Spain, faces extradition.